The Panama Canal Authority (ACP) is seeking bids from contractors for an estimated $2 billion of water-supply infrastructure projects to help solve low water levels attirbuted to climate change that are affecting operations despite conservation measures and new fees. The program is intended to meet the canal’s water needs and local drinking water supply requirements for 50 years.
Economic, environmental & societal impacts for sustainable society.
Specialties: energy, carbon footprint and life cycle costing. © Villa Real ®
11.9.2020
3.8.2020
UK: Merituulivoimalan sähkön hinta yhä alemmaksi
UK can have "negative-subsidy" offshore wind online in couple
of years
The UK’s
contracts for difference (CfD) auctions in September 2019 will likely bring the
world’s first "negative-subsidy" offshore wind farms, according to a
study led by Imperial College London (ICL) researchers.
A number of
tenders in Europe have contracted “subsidy-free” offshore wind energy, but the
UK may be the first country to get offshore wind that would actually reduce the
electricity bills of homes and businesses, the international team behind the
analysis says.
Looking at
likely future electricity price trends, the researchers concluded that the
price for offshore wind power achieved in the third CfD auctions round is “very
likely” to be below the UK wholesale price for electricity over the lifetime of
the wind farms. This means that these power plants at sea will be paying money
back to the government.
Offshore wind
projects with almost 5.5 GW of capacity, to be brought online in the mid-2020s,
secured CfDs in the 2019 auctions. The list includes projects like Seagreen 1
and Sofia. The strike prices in the auction arrived at around GBP 40 (USD
51.4/EUR 44) per MWh, or 30% below these reached in the CfD auction held in
2017, and two-thirds lower than the offshore wind strike prices in 2015.
“This amazing
progress has been made possible by new technology, economies of scale and
efficient supply chains around the North Sea, but also by a decade of concerted
policymaking designed to reduce the risk for investing in offshore wind, which
has made financing these huge billion-pound projects much cheaper,” said Dr
Iain Staffell from the Centre for Environmental Policy at Imperial.
A fourth CfD
auction round is planned for 2021. [emp]
31.7.2020
7.7.2020
USA: Bird-Safe Buildings
Every
year in the U.S., about one million birds die as a consequence of collisions
with buildings. Now House Passes Bill To Retrofit Federal Buildings To
Reduce Bird Collisions.
Bird-safety
enthusiasts, including ENR 2014 Newsmaker Christine Sheppard, are hailing the
passage last week, by the U.S. House of Representatives, of H.R. 919 –
Bird-Safe Buildings Act.
Sheppard,
director of the glass collisions program at the American Bird Conservancy
(ABC), calls the recognition of the issue at the federal level a momentous
achievement because, if passed by the Senate and put into law, it will set an
example for the entire nation.
The
bipartisan bill is designed to reduce bird mortality by calling for federal
buildings to incorporate bird-safe building materials and design features. As
many as 1 billion (?) birds a year die in collisions with buildings in the U.S.
alone, according to ABC. Congressman
Mike Quigley (D-Ill.) has been the driving force behind the legislation for
more than a decade. The bill will soon be introduced in the Senate, and
conservationists are optimistic about its passage, says ABC.
Design
Techniques
Many
bird-friendly design techniques—such as installing screens or grills on windows
and minimizing the use of glass on lower floors—are already used in some
federal buildings to control heat and light, or for security. The bill would
require the U.S. General Services Administration to apply similar measures,
where practicable, to all new and existing federal buildings.
In
2008, ABC founded the only national-level program dedicated to reducing bird
deaths from collisions with glass, says Sheppard. Since then, more than 20
states, counties and municipalities have passed bird-friendly legislation.
Last
December 2019, the New York City Council passed the nation’s most comprehensive
bird-friendly buildings law. According to New York City Audubon's Project Safe
Flight, 90,000 to 230,000 birds die after colliding with glass each year during
their migrations through New York City alone. [enr]
Tällä viikolla 3 lintua on kuollut lennettyään omakotitaloni ikkunalasiin.
10.4.2020
Saksa: Sähkön hinta -5 c/kWh
German day-ahead power prices plunged as low as EUR -50.26/MWh on an
hourly basis for a fourth consecutive Sunday 05.04.2020 amid low demand and high
renewables feed-in.
A total of five consecutive hours saw negative prices
between 12:00 and 17:00 CEST, with the hour from 14:00 CEST recording the
lowest price. [emp]
10.3.2020
Euroopan suurin aurinkovoimala Espanjaan
Euroopan
suurin aurinkovoimala valmistui Espanjassa viime vuoden lopulla. Nasan
satelliittikuvat näyttävät nyt, miten kymmenen neliökilometrin alueelle
levittäytyneet aurinkopaneelit muuttivat maalaismaisemaa avaruudesta
katsottuna. Keskiaikaisen tutkimusmatkailija Núñez de Balboan mukaan nimetty
voimala sijaitsee Länsi-Espanjassa Usagren kaupungissa. Sen valmistustyöt
kestivät alle vuoden.
Aurinkopaneelit peittävät Nasan mukaan lähes 10
neliökilometrin kokoisen alueen. Voimala koostuu 1,4 miljoonasta
aurinkopaneelista, ja sen kapasiteetiksi ilmoitetaan 500 MW. Voimalan
on määrä tuottaa energiaa 250 000 ihmisen tarpeisiin. [tm]
14.2.2020
UK: Puolet uusiutuvaa sähköä 08.02.2020
Winter
storm Ciara has helped the UK set a new wind power generation record last
Saturday, when the renewable energy covered 56% of the country’s electricity
demand, Kallanish Energy reports.
The
storm battered Britain with heavy rain and winds of up to 100 miles per hour
over the weekend.
According
to data from utility Drax Group, wind power generation supplied as much as
14,880 megawatts (MW) to the national grid early Saturday. Overall on that day,
wind generation from both onshore and offshore farms supplied 44.26% of the
British demand, or 13,950 MW – beating the Dec. 9, 2019, record.
On
Feb. 8, nuclear power accounted for an 18.40% share of demand and gas for
17.73%. Both energy sources are the backbone of power supply in a post-coal UK. [emp]
10.2.2020
EU 2019: Tuuli- ja aurinkosähkö ohittivat hiilivoiman
Last year saw the share of renewables in EU-wide power generation climb to a record high of 34.6%, or 1.8 percentage points higher than in 2018. The electricity produced by wind and solar parks rose by 64 TWh to 569 TWh in 2019 and thus, for the first time, surpassed the amount of coal-fired electricity by 100 TWh. Wind farms generated 14% more electricity in 2019 compared to 2018, while solar power plants experienced a 7% increase in their output. On the other hand, hydropower production went down by more than 6% because of ongoing drought. [emp]
6.2.2020
Terrafamelle lupa uraanin talteenottoon
Terrafamelle
lupa uraanin talteenottoon Sotkamossa
Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriö
6.2.2020
Tiedote
Valtioneuvosto myönsi 6.2.2020
Terrafame Oy:lle ydinenergialaissa tarkoitetun luvan kaivos- ja
malminrikastustoimintaan. Lupa oikeuttaa yhtiön uraanin talteenottoon Sotkamon
kaivoksesta saatavasta malmista. Terrafame jätti lupahakemuksensa
valtioneuvostolle lokakuussa 2017.
Valtioneuvosto katsoo
päätöksessään, että hanke on yhteiskunnan kokonaisedun mukainen ja täyttää
ydin- ja säteilyturvallisuutta koskevat vaatimukset. Ennen käytön aloittamista
uraanin talteenottolaitos tarvitsee vielä Säteilyturvakeskuksen (STUK) antaman
käynnistämisluvan.
Valtioneuvosto myönsi luvan myös
Harjavallan nikkelijalostusyksikössä (Norilsk Nickel Harjavalta Oy) erotetun
uraanin talteenottoon, kuitenkin siten, että Sotkamoon siirrettävän uraanin
enimmäismäärä on enintään 10 000 kg. Kyseessä on Sotkamon kaivokselta jatkojalostukseen
toimitetun materiaalin mukana Harjavallan nikkelijalostusyksikköön (Norilsk
Nickel Harjavalta Oy) vuosina 2011-2015 päätynyt uraani.
Uraanin talteenottoa varten ei kaivoksesta erikseen louhittaisi malmia,
vaan talteenotto tapahtuu prosessiliuoksesta. Uraani voidaan erottaa
prosessista sinkkisulfidin saostuksen jälkeen erillisessä
talteenottolaitoksessa. Laitos on jo valmiina kaivosalueella.
Saatavan uraani-puolituotteen
tuotantomääräksi arvioidaan enintään 250 uraanitonnia vuodessa. Se kuljetetaan
Terrafamen laitokselta ns. Yellow cake -puolituotteena ulkomaille
jatkojalostukseen, jossa siitä valmistetaan ydinvoimalaitosten polttoaineeksi
sopivaa raaka-ainetta.
Jatkojalostusta varten tuote
kuljetetaan kansallisesti ja kansainvälisesti hyväksytyille, kansainvälisen
atomienergiajärjestön (IAEA) ydinmateriaalivalvonnan piiriin kuuluville
laitoksille. Näin varmistetaan, että uraani hyödynnetään vastuullisesti ja vain
rauhanomaisiin tarkoituksiin.
Ympäristöministeriö katsoi
antamassaan lausunnossa, että talteenotolla voidaan vähentää merkittävästi
uraanin kerääntymistä alueella ja vesiympäristöön. Samoin Kainuun elinkeino-,
liikenne- ja ympäristökeskuksen YVA-yhteysviranomaisen lausunnossaan toteaman
mukaan toiminnan ympäristövaikutukset alueella ovat pienemmät, kun uraanilaitos
otetaan käyttöön kuin tilanteessa, jossa toimintaa jatketaan ilman uraanin
talteenottoa.
Lupa sisältää
ydinturvallisuuteen ja mahdollisiin ydinjätteisiin liittyviä ehtoja. Niiden
mukaan Terrafamen on päivitettävä uraanin talteenottolaitoksen käytöstä
poistamista koskeva selvityksensä perustuen ensimmäisten kolmen vuoden käyttö-
ja ylläpitokokemuksiin, seurattava uraanin talteenottolaitoksen jätekertymää ja
jätteiden käsittelyn toteutumista, ja raportoitava tulokset Säteilyturvakeskukselle
vuosittain.
Yhtiön on myös päivitettävä
jätehuoltoa koskevat selvityksensä kolmen ensimmäisen toimintavuoden
käyttökokemusten perusteella, tehtävä uraanin talteenotolle ydinenergialain
mukainen määräaikainen turvallisuusarvio 15 vuoden välein, sekä täydennettävä
Säteilyturvakeskukselle toimittamiaan aineistoja hyvissä ajoin ennen toiminnan
aloittamista.
Myönnetty lupa on voimassa
kaivoksen toiminta-ajan, kuitenkin enintään vuoden 2050 loppuun. Se lakkaa
olemasta voimassa, jos uraanin talteenottoa ei aloiteta kolmen vuoden kuluessa
sen lainvoimaiseksi tulosta.
Päätösasiakirjat julkaistaan
verkossa osoitteessa www.tem.fi/paatokset
Lisätiedot:
erityisasiantuntija Eriika
Melkas, TEM, puh. 040 194 7591
teollisuusneuvos Liisa
Heikinheimo, TEM, puh. 050 567 5451
USA: Uudet julkiset rakennukset klassiseen muotoon
Will the White House Order New Federal Architecture To Be Classical?
Engineering News Record has obtained what appears
to be a preliminary draft of the order,
under which the White House would require rewriting the Guiding Principles for
Federal Architecture, issued in 1962, to ensure that “the classical
architectural style shall be the preferred and default style” for
new and upgraded federal buildings. Entitled “Making Federal Buildings
Beautiful Again,” the draft order argues that the founding fathers embraced the
classical models of “democratic Athens” and “republican Rome” for the capital’s
early buildings because the style symbolized the new nation’s “self-governing
ideals” (never mind, of course, that it was the prevailing style of the day).The draft decries the quality of architecture under
the General Service Administration’s (GSA) Design Excellence Program for
its failure to re-integrate “our national values into Federal buildings” which
too often have been “influenced by Brutalism and Deconstructivism.” The draft document specifically cites
the U.S. Federal Building in San Francisco (2007, by Morphosis),
the U.S. Courthouse in Austin, Texas (2012, by Mack Scogin
Merrill Elam Architects), and the Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. U.S. Courthouse in
Miami (2007, by Arquitectonica) for having “little aesthetic appeal.”The White House did not respond to a request for comment about
the executive order. Meanwhile, last week, the GSA’s Chief Architect and Director of the
Design Excellence Program, David Insinga, resigned his post.The original Guiding Principles, written by the late Senator Daniel
Patrick Moynihan, mandated that Federal architecture “must provide visual
testimony to the dignity, enterprise, vigor, and stability of the American
government.” The draft document uses the same words—dignity, enterprise, vigor
and stability—while declaring that Brutalist and Deconstructivist styles “fail
to satisfy these requirements and shall not be used.”Yet Moynihan’s Guiding Principles also dictate that “an official style
must be avoided,” and that new buildings should reflect their time. “Design
must flow from the architectural profession to the government and not vice
versa,” the guidelines state. “The Government should be willing to pay some
additional cost to avoid excessive uniformity in design of Federal buildings.”The mechanism for the radical upending of these principles, in order to
promote classical and traditional regional architecture (Spanish colonial
style, for example, would be permitted in places like Florida), would be a
President’s Committee for the Re-Beautification of Federal Architecture. Its
members would include the Commissioner of the GSA’s Public Building Service and
at least one member of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, designated by the
President. That commission, which approves architecture and design in much of
the nation’s capital, is composed of seven experts, appointed by the President
to four-year terms.President Trump’s first appointment, in November 2018, was Justin
Shubow, the president of the National Civic Art Society, which is devoted to
furthering classical architecture. Its website contends that “contemporary
architecture is by and large a failure,” and states the organization’s mission
is “to help architecture return to its pre-Modernist roots.” Much of the
language in the draft document echoes the website for Shubow’s organization; it
also draws heavily from an article that appeared in City Journal last summer,
"Why America Needs Classical Architecture," by Catesby Leigh. Leigh
is listed as the 2018-2019 research fellow of the National Civic Art Society.Shubow became well known for his dogged opposition to the proposed Eisenhower Memorial in Washington, designed by Frank Gehry (which is finally
opening this May). President Trump’s two most recent appointees to the Fine
Arts Commission, made this past December, are James C. McCrery II, AIA, a
founder and board member of the National Civic Art Society, and the
Indiana-based architect Duncan G. Stroik, AIA, whose work is “informed by the
timelessness of classical architecture and the humanism of traditional cities,”
according to the Commission’s website. The terms of the four other members of
the Commission expire next December.As a real estate developer, Trump’s taste in architecture tended to the
glass and steel of modernism, albeit in an often glitzy style—from the 1983
Trump Tower in New York, designed by the late Der Scutt of Poor, Swanke, Hayden
& Connell, to the 2009 Trump International Hotel and Tower in Chicago,
designed by Adrian Smith, then at SOM. When Trump bought the Gulf and Western
building on Columbus Circle in New York in the 1990s, he hired Philip Johnson
and Costas Kondylis to re-skin its facade in bronze-tinted glass, prompting the
late critic Herbert Muschamp to declare it was an
International Style skyscraper decked out in a gold lamé party dress.Will an executive order to bring classical design language to new
federal architecture even be issued? The White House certainly has more
pressing matters on its plate. But if it happens, quietly or otherwise, the
impact would be enormous.In response to this story, the American Institute of Architects (AIA)
issued the following statement: “The AIA strongly opposes uniform style mandates for federal
architecture. Architecture should be
designed for the specific communities that it serves, reflecting our rich
nation’s diverse places, thought, culture and climates. Architects are
committed to honoring our past as well as reflecting our future progress,
protecting the freedom of thought and expression that are essential to
democracy.” [enr]
Engineering News Record has obtained what appears
to be a preliminary draft of the order,
under which the White House would require rewriting the Guiding Principles for
Federal Architecture, issued in 1962, to ensure that “the classical
architectural style shall be the preferred and default style” for
new and upgraded federal buildings. Entitled “Making Federal Buildings
Beautiful Again,” the draft order argues that the founding fathers embraced the
classical models of “democratic Athens” and “republican Rome” for the capital’s
early buildings because the style symbolized the new nation’s “self-governing
ideals” (never mind, of course, that it was the prevailing style of the day).
The draft decries the quality of architecture under
the General Service Administration’s (GSA) Design Excellence Program for
its failure to re-integrate “our national values into Federal buildings” which
too often have been “influenced by Brutalism and Deconstructivism.” The draft document specifically cites
the U.S. Federal Building in San Francisco (2007, by Morphosis),
the U.S. Courthouse in Austin, Texas (2012, by Mack Scogin
Merrill Elam Architects), and the Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. U.S. Courthouse in
Miami (2007, by Arquitectonica) for having “little aesthetic appeal.”
The White House did not respond to a request for comment about
the executive order. Meanwhile, last week, the GSA’s Chief Architect and Director of the
Design Excellence Program, David Insinga, resigned his post.
The original Guiding Principles, written by the late Senator Daniel
Patrick Moynihan, mandated that Federal architecture “must provide visual
testimony to the dignity, enterprise, vigor, and stability of the American
government.” The draft document uses the same words—dignity, enterprise, vigor
and stability—while declaring that Brutalist and Deconstructivist styles “fail
to satisfy these requirements and shall not be used.”
Yet Moynihan’s Guiding Principles also dictate that “an official style
must be avoided,” and that new buildings should reflect their time. “Design
must flow from the architectural profession to the government and not vice
versa,” the guidelines state. “The Government should be willing to pay some
additional cost to avoid excessive uniformity in design of Federal buildings.”
The mechanism for the radical upending of these principles, in order to
promote classical and traditional regional architecture (Spanish colonial
style, for example, would be permitted in places like Florida), would be a
President’s Committee for the Re-Beautification of Federal Architecture. Its
members would include the Commissioner of the GSA’s Public Building Service and
at least one member of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, designated by the
President. That commission, which approves architecture and design in much of
the nation’s capital, is composed of seven experts, appointed by the President
to four-year terms.
President Trump’s first appointment, in November 2018, was Justin
Shubow, the president of the National Civic Art Society, which is devoted to
furthering classical architecture. Its website contends that “contemporary
architecture is by and large a failure,” and states the organization’s mission
is “to help architecture return to its pre-Modernist roots.” Much of the
language in the draft document echoes the website for Shubow’s organization; it
also draws heavily from an article that appeared in City Journal last summer,
"Why America Needs Classical Architecture," by Catesby Leigh. Leigh
is listed as the 2018-2019 research fellow of the National Civic Art Society.
Shubow became well known for his dogged opposition to the proposed Eisenhower Memorial in Washington, designed by Frank Gehry (which is finally
opening this May). President Trump’s two most recent appointees to the Fine
Arts Commission, made this past December, are James C. McCrery II, AIA, a
founder and board member of the National Civic Art Society, and the
Indiana-based architect Duncan G. Stroik, AIA, whose work is “informed by the
timelessness of classical architecture and the humanism of traditional cities,”
according to the Commission’s website. The terms of the four other members of
the Commission expire next December.
As a real estate developer, Trump’s taste in architecture tended to the
glass and steel of modernism, albeit in an often glitzy style—from the 1983
Trump Tower in New York, designed by the late Der Scutt of Poor, Swanke, Hayden
& Connell, to the 2009 Trump International Hotel and Tower in Chicago,
designed by Adrian Smith, then at SOM. When Trump bought the Gulf and Western
building on Columbus Circle in New York in the 1990s, he hired Philip Johnson
and Costas Kondylis to re-skin its facade in bronze-tinted glass, prompting the
late critic Herbert Muschamp to declare it was an
International Style skyscraper decked out in a gold lamé party dress.
Will an executive order to bring classical design language to new
federal architecture even be issued? The White House certainly has more
pressing matters on its plate. But if it happens, quietly or otherwise, the
impact would be enormous.
In response to this story, the American Institute of Architects (AIA)
issued the following statement: “The AIA strongly opposes uniform style mandates for federal
architecture. Architecture should be
designed for the specific communities that it serves, reflecting our rich
nation’s diverse places, thought, culture and climates. Architects are
committed to honoring our past as well as reflecting our future progress,
protecting the freedom of thought and expression that are essential to
democracy.” [enr]
Tilaa:
Blogitekstit (Atom)